Who Owns Interfor Company?

Interfor Bundle

Get Bundle
Get Full Bundle:
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10

TOTAL:

Who Owns Interfor Corporation?

Understanding Interfor Corporation's ownership is key to grasping its strategy and governance. The company's journey began in 1963 as Yorkston Lumber Company, evolving through several names before becoming Interfor Corporation in 2014.

Who Owns Interfor Company?

Sauder Industries acquired a controlling interest in 1977, significantly influencing its early path. Interfor is now a major global lumber producer with operations across North America.

Who owns Interfor Corporation?

Who Founded Interfor?

Interfor Corporation's journey began in the 1930s with a single sawmill in British Columbia. Officially incorporated as Yorkston Lumber Company on May 6, 1963, its early ownership structure is not extensively documented in public records. The company transitioned to public ownership in 1967, adopting the name Whonnock Industries.

Key Event Year Ownership Change
Formal Incorporation 1963 Yorkston Lumber Company established
Public Offering 1967 Became Whonnock Industries
Acquisition of Controlling Interest 1977 Sauder Industries acquired a controlling stake
Transfer to Holding Company 1979 Controlling stake transferred to Mountclair Investment Corporation
Icon

Early Beginnings

The company's roots trace back to a sawmill established in the 1930s. It was formally incorporated in 1963 as Yorkston Lumber Company.

Icon

Public Transition

In 1967, the company became a public entity, changing its name to Whonnock Industries. This marked a significant step in its corporate evolution.

Icon

Sauder Family Influence

A pivotal moment in early Interfor ownership occurred in 1977 when Sauder Industries acquired a controlling interest. This stake later moved to the Sauder family's holding company, Mountclair Investment Corporation, in 1979.

Icon

Foundational Control

The acquisition by Sauder Industries established the Sauder family as a dominant force in the company's early control and strategic direction. This period laid the groundwork for future developments.

Icon

Limited Early Details

Specific details regarding initial founder equity splits or early ownership agreements are not readily available in public records. The focus remains on the major acquisition events.

Icon

Ownership History

The company's ownership history is marked by the significant shift in 1977, solidifying the Sauder family's influence. This event is a key aspect of the Brief History of Interfor.

The acquisition by Sauder Industries in 1977, and the subsequent transfer of control to Mountclair Investment Corporation in 1979, marked the most significant early development in Interfor's ownership structure. This established the Sauder family as the primary controlling entity during the company's formative years as a publicly traded entity.

Icon

Key Ownership Milestones

The early ownership of the company was significantly shaped by key acquisitions and transitions. These events laid the foundation for its corporate structure.

  • Initial establishment of a sawmill in the 1930s.
  • Formal incorporation as Yorkston Lumber Company in 1963.
  • Transition to public ownership and renaming to Whonnock Industries in 1967.
  • Acquisition of a controlling interest by Sauder Industries in 1977.
  • Transfer of controlling interest to Mountclair Investment Corporation (Sauder family) in 1979.

Interfor SWOT Analysis

  • Complete SWOT Breakdown
  • Fully Customizable
  • Editable in Excel & Word
  • Professional Formatting
  • Investor-Ready Format
Get Related Template

How Has Interfor’s Ownership Changed Over Time?

Interfor's journey as a public entity began in 1967, initially under the name Whonnock Industries. Since then, its ownership landscape has transformed, now reflecting a diverse mix of individual and institutional stakeholders. This evolution underscores the dynamic nature of corporate ownership in the modern financial era.

Investor Type Percentage of Ownership (as of Jan 20, 2025) Number of Shares (Institutional)
Individual Investors 45% N/A
Institutional Investors 44% 10,605,314
Top 23 Shareholders (Combined) 50% N/A

The Interfor ownership structure is characterized by a significant presence of both individual and institutional investors. As of January 20, 2025, individual investors hold the largest stake at 45%, with institutional investors closely following at 44%, representing over 10.6 million shares. The collective holdings of the top 23 shareholders account for half of the company's ownership, indicating a concentration of influence among key entities. This distribution suggests a broad base of individual support alongside substantial backing from financial institutions, which often implies a positive outlook from financial analysts covering the company. Understanding the Interfor ownership structure is key for investors looking to grasp the company's governance and strategic direction.

Icon

Key Stakeholders in Interfor

Interfor's ownership is a blend of individual and institutional investors, with a notable presence from long-standing family influence and recent insider activity.

  • Individual investors collectively own 45% of Interfor.
  • Institutional investors hold 44% of the company's stock.
  • Prominent institutional shareholders include Fidelity Value Fund and Third Avenue Value Fund.
  • The Sauder family maintains influence, with Lawrence Sauder serving as Chair of the Board since 2008.
  • Recent insider buying suggests internal confidence in the company's prospects.

Among the significant institutional shareholders are FDVLX - Fidelity Value Fund, FFGCX - Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund, TAVFX - THIRD AVENUE VALUE FUND Institutional Class, AVALX - Aegis Value Fund Class I, FSMVX - Fidelity Mid Cap Value Fund, DISVX - Dfa International Small Cap Value Portfolio, and IRCYX - International Small Cap Portfolio Advisor Class. The enduring influence of the Sauder family is also a notable aspect of Interfor company ownership, with Lawrence Sauder having been a director since 1984 and holding the position of Chair of the Board since 2008. Recent insider purchasing activity further signals a positive internal sentiment towards the company's future performance. These factors collectively contribute to the overall Interfor stock ownership profile, providing insights for those interested in the Target Market of Interfor and its broader corporate landscape.

Interfor PESTLE Analysis

  • Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
  • No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
  • Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
  • Instant Download, Ready to Use
  • 100% Editable, Fully Customizable
Get Related Template

Who Sits on Interfor’s Board?

As of the Annual General Meeting on May 8, 2025, Interfor's Board of Directors comprises eleven members. This composition reflects a recent adjustment from twelve directors, as approved by the shareholders. The current board includes key figures such as Lawrence Sauder, who serves as Chair, and Ian Fillinger, the President & CEO.

Director Name Role Tenure Highlight
Lawrence Sauder Chair Long tenure, indicating continued family influence
Ian Fillinger President & CEO Executive Director
Nicolle Butcher Director Appointed 2023-2024
Geoffrey Evans Director Appointed 2023-2024
Christina Sistrunk Director Appointed 2023-2024
Christopher Griffin Director
Rhonda Hunter Director

Interfor operates under a fundamental 'one-share-one-vote' principle, ensuring that each common share carries equal voting power. Shareholders of record as of March 12, 2025, were eligible to participate in the voting process at the May 8, 2025, Annual General Meeting. The company upholds a majority voting policy for uncontested director elections, meaning nominees require more 'for' votes than 'withheld' votes to be elected. At the 2025 AGM, all eleven director nominees secured re-election. Notably, Nicolle Butcher and Geoffrey Evans experienced higher withhold rates, at 5.49%, indicating some shareholder observation, though this did not impede their re-election. The advisory resolution concerning executive compensation, often referred to as 'Say-on-Pay,' garnered substantial support, with 97.11% of votes cast in favor, signaling shareholder confidence in the established compensation structure.

Icon

Understanding Interfor's Voting Power

Interfor's voting structure is straightforward, with each common share granting one vote. This system ensures that all shareholders have a direct say in company matters.

  • One-share-one-vote policy ensures equitable voting rights.
  • Shareholders of record on March 12, 2025, could vote at the May 8, 2025, AGM.
  • Majority voting policy applies to uncontested director elections.
  • All 11 director nominees were re-elected at the 2025 AGM.
  • The 'Say-on-Pay' resolution received 97.11% approval.
  • Understanding the Revenue Streams & Business Model of Interfor can provide context for ownership decisions.

Interfor Business Model Canvas

  • Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
  • Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
  • Investor-Ready BMC Format
  • 100% Editable and Customizable
  • Clear and Structured Layout
Get Related Template

What Recent Changes Have Shaped Interfor’s Ownership Landscape?

Over the past three to five years, Interfor Corporation has undergone significant strategic shifts impacting its ownership landscape. These changes include asset monetization and operational adjustments in response to market conditions, influencing the company's overall structure and investor profile.

Transaction Date Proceeds AAC Sold (m3)
Coastal B.C. forest tenures sale November 2023 $23.5 million 181,000
Coastal B.C. forest tenures sale 2024 $67.1 million 491,000
Coastal B.C. forest tenures sale Q1 2025 $7.4 million (gross) N/A

In response to challenging lumber market conditions and elevated log costs, Interfor made several operational adjustments. These included the indefinite curtailment of its Philomath, Oregon, sawmill in February 2024, and subsequently, its Meldrim, Georgia, and Summerville, South Carolina, sawmills in August 2024. These curtailments represent a combined annual capacity reduction of 330 million board feet. A notable strategic move was the planned exit from Quebec operations, announced in October 2024 and completed in January 2025. This involved the sale of three manufacturing facilities and the closure of its Montreal corporate office, impacting a combined annual production capacity of 255 million board feet. To bolster its financial flexibility, the company renewed and extended its revolving credit facility in July 2025. During 2023 and 2024, no common shares were repurchased under the company's Normal Course Issuer Bid (NCIB).

Icon Operational Adjustments

Interfor curtailed operations at multiple sawmills in response to market pressures. The company also executed a strategic exit from its Quebec operations, selling manufacturing facilities.

Icon Financial Strategy

The company enhanced its financial flexibility by renewing its revolving credit facility. No share repurchases occurred under the NCIB in 2023 and 2024.

Icon Market Outlook and Confidence

North American lumber markets face continued volatility due to economic factors and geopolitical issues. Despite these headwinds, Interfor maintains a conservative outlook for 2025, anticipating potential duty increases on Canadian lumber.

Icon Internal Confidence Indicators

Recent insider buying, noted as of January 2025, suggests internal confidence in the company's prospects. This occurs despite ongoing market challenges and the company's strategic adjustments, as detailed in its Growth Strategy of Interfor.

Interfor Porter's Five Forces Analysis

  • Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
  • Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
  • 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
  • Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
  • Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked
Get Related Template

Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.