Who Owns BP Company?

BP Bundle

Get Bundle
Get Full Bundle:
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10

TOTAL:

Who Owns BP p.l.c.?

Understanding BP's ownership is key to grasping its strategic decisions and market impact. The company's history, marked by significant events like the Deepwater Horizon incident, highlights how ownership shifts can drive major operational and governance changes.

Who Owns BP Company?

BP, a global energy leader, has evolved from its origins as the Anglo-Persian Oil Company in 1909. Its journey reflects changing energy landscapes and corporate structures, influencing its current position as a major player in both traditional and emerging energy sectors.

As of August 2025, BP's market capitalization stands at approximately $87.79 billion USD. This valuation underscores its status as a significant publicly traded entity. For a deeper dive into the external factors affecting such companies, consider a BP PESTEL Analysis.

Who Founded BP?

The origins of BP's ownership trace back to English millionaire William Knox D'Arcy, who in 1901 secured a significant oil concession in Persia. Initially funded by his personal wealth from Australian mining ventures, D'Arcy later sold a substantial portion of his rights to the Burmah Oil Company due to financial pressures during exploration.

Key Figure Role Initial Contribution
William Knox D'Arcy Secured Persian oil concession Personal wealth from Mount Morgan Mine
Burmah Oil Company Acquired significant rights from D'Arcy Financier of exploration
Lord Strathcona First Chairman of APOC Minority stake holder
Icon

Concession Secured

William Knox D'Arcy obtained an extensive oil concession in Persia in 1901. He financed this venture using his personal fortune.

Icon

Financial Strain and Partnership

D'Arcy faced financial difficulties during the exploration phase. He consequently sold a major part of his rights to the Burmah Oil Company.

Icon

Formation of APOC

The Anglo-Persian Oil Company (APOC) was incorporated on April 14, 1909, as a subsidiary of Burmah Oil. This was to develop the oil discoveries in Persia.

Icon

Public and Government Investment

Lord Strathcona served as the first chairman and held a minority stake. Some shares were also offered to the public, broadening the initial BP ownership base.

Icon

British Government Acquisition

In 1914, the British government acquired a controlling 51% interest in APOC. This strategic move secured oil for the Royal Navy and established the government as the principal stockholder.

Icon

Early Profit Sharing Disputes

Initial agreements stipulated 16% of future profits for the Shah of Persia. APOC's adherence to these terms was inconsistent, leading to renegotiations by 1933.

The early ownership structure of the company was significantly shaped by the British government's acquisition of a 51% controlling interest in 1914. This move effectively nationalized the company, ensuring a vital oil supply for the Royal Navy during the lead-up to World War I. For decades, the British government remained the principal stockholder, influencing the company's direction. Early profit-sharing agreements, such as the 60-year concession granting 16% of profits to the Shah of Persia, also played a role in the company's history. However, the company's inconsistent adherence to these terms, resulting in Iran receiving less than its contractual share by 1933, necessitated renegotiations and highlighted the complex geopolitical factors influencing BP ownership and operations. Understanding this historical context is crucial for grasping the Growth Strategy of BP.

Icon

Foundational Ownership Milestones

The initial ownership of BP was established through a concession in Persia and subsequent partnerships. Key decisions by early stakeholders significantly shaped its trajectory.

  • William Knox D'Arcy secured the initial oil concession in Persia.
  • The Burmah Oil Company became a major stakeholder after acquiring rights from D'Arcy.
  • The Anglo-Persian Oil Company (APOC) was formed in 1909.
  • The British government acquired a 51% controlling interest in APOC in 1914.
  • Early agreements involved profit-sharing with the Persian government, leading to later disputes.

BP SWOT Analysis

  • Complete SWOT Breakdown
  • Fully Customizable
  • Editable in Excel & Word
  • Professional Formatting
  • Investor-Ready Format
Get Related Template

How Has BP’s Ownership Changed Over Time?

BP's ownership journey began as the Anglo-Persian Oil Company in 1909, with the British government taking a controlling 51% stake in 1914. This state-controlled status persisted for decades until a significant privatization process between 1977 and 1987 transformed it into a fully public entity.

Event Year Impact on Ownership
Founding as Anglo-Persian Oil Company 1909 Initial private ownership
British Government acquires 51% stake 1914 Became state-controlled
Renamed Anglo-Iranian Oil Company 1935 Continued state control
Renamed The British Petroleum Company 1954 Continued state control
Gradual privatization 1977-1987 Transition to public ownership
Acquisition of Standard Oil Company (Ohio) 1987 Increased public float
Merger with Amoco Corporation 1998 Formation of BP Amoco p.l.c.
Acquisitions of Atlantic Richfield Co. (ARCO) and Burmah Castrol 2000 Further consolidation
Name shortened to BP p.l.c. 2001 Branding change

The privatization of BP marked a pivotal moment, shifting its ownership from government control to a broad base of public and institutional investors. This transition facilitated significant corporate growth and strategic realignments, fundamentally altering its operational and financial direction.

Icon

Major Institutional Investors in BP

Today, BP's ownership is primarily held by large institutional investors who manage assets on behalf of clients. These entities play a crucial role in the company's governance and strategic decision-making.

  • BlackRock, Inc.
  • The Vanguard Group, Inc.
  • State Street Corporation
  • Norges Bank
  • Morgan Stanley
  • Dimensional Fund Advisors Lp
  • Franklin Resources Inc
  • Nomura Holdings Inc
  • Bnp Paribas Arbitrage, Sa
  • Citadel Advisors Llc

The shift from government ownership to a widely dispersed institutional and public shareholder base has profoundly influenced BP's corporate strategy, fostering a greater focus on shareholder value and market responsiveness. This evolution is a key aspect of understanding Brief History of BP and its current standing. For instance, as of August 2024, key individuals like Murray Auchincloss (CEO) and Pamela Daley were noted among the top individual insiders holding shares, illustrating the blend of executive and institutional influence on BP's ownership structure.

BP PESTLE Analysis

  • Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
  • No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
  • Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
  • Instant Download, Ready to Use
  • 100% Editable, Fully Customizable
Get Related Template

Who Sits on BP’s Board?

As of mid-2025, BP's Board of Directors is composed of executive and independent non-executive members, with Helge Lund serving as Chair. The leadership team includes CEO Murray Auchincloss and CFO Kate Thomson, with Dame Amanda Blanc as Senior Independent Director.

Director Name Position Appointment/Planned Departure
Helge Lund Chair
Murray Auchincloss Chief Executive Officer
Kate Thomson Chief Financial Officer
Dame Amanda Blanc Senior Independent Director
Dave Hager Independent Non-Executive Director Appointed June 2, 2025
Melody Meyer Independent Non-Executive Director Planned retirement at 2026 AGM
Tushar Morzaria Independent Non-Executive Director
Hina Nagarajan Independent Non-Executive Director
Satish Pai Independent Non-Executive Director
Karen Richardson Independent Non-Executive Director
Johannes Teyssen Independent Non-Executive Director
Ian Tyler Independent Non-Executive Director Appointed April 1, 2025
Simon Henry Non-Executive Director Effective September 1, 2025

BP's voting power is structured around its issued share capital. As of June 30, 2025, the company had 15,900,733,509 ordinary shares, each with one vote, and 12,706,252 preference shares carrying two votes per £5 nominal capital. Treasury shares, totaling 585,579,485 on the same date, do not confer voting rights. The total number of voting rights stood at 15,905,816,009. A significant event occurred at the April 2025 Annual General Meeting, where 24% of shareholders opposed the reappointment of Chairman Helge Lund, a move attributed to investor dissatisfaction with the revised climate strategy. Elliott Management, holding a 5% stake since February 2025, was noted for advocating strategic shifts potentially favoring fossil fuel investments.

Icon

Understanding BP's Shareholding

BP's ownership is distributed among various shareholders, influencing its strategic direction. The company's voting structure ensures that ordinary shareholders have a primary say in corporate decisions.

  • Ordinary shares carry one vote each.
  • Preference shares have a dual-vote structure.
  • Treasury shares do not have voting rights.
  • The total voting rights reflect the issued ordinary and preference shares.
  • Understanding Revenue Streams & Business Model of BP provides context for ownership influence.

BP Business Model Canvas

  • Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
  • Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
  • Investor-Ready BMC Format
  • 100% Editable and Customizable
  • Clear and Structured Layout
Get Related Template

What Recent Changes Have Shaped BP’s Ownership Landscape?

BP's ownership landscape has seen dynamic shifts over the past 3-5 years, influenced by strategic financial maneuvers and evolving industry pressures. The company has actively pursued share buyback programs, signaling a commitment to returning capital to shareholders and managing its equity base.

Action Planned Amount Period
Share Repurchase Program At least $14 billion 2024-2025
Additional Share Buyback Up to $3.5 billion Second half of 2024
New Share Repurchase Program Up to $750 million Initiated August 2025

In early 2025, BP underwent a significant strategic recalibration, often termed a 'complete reset' of its energy transition strategy. This involved a notable reduction in investments allocated to low-carbon projects, exceeding $5 billion annually, while simultaneously increasing spending on oil and gas operations to $10 billion per year. The objective behind this pivot was to bolster production levels, targeting 2.3-2.5 million barrels per day by 2030, and to enhance overall shareholder value. However, this strategic adjustment led to a divergence of opinions among BP shareholders.

Icon Strategic Shift in Investment Allocation

BP is reallocating capital, reducing low-carbon investments by over $5 billion annually. Concurrently, oil and gas spending is increasing to $10 billion per year.

Icon Production Targets by 2030

The company aims to boost its oil and gas production to a range of 2.3 to 2.5 million barrels per day. This target is set for achievement by the year 2030.

Icon Leadership and Governance Changes

Murray Auchincloss assumed the role of CEO in early 2024. Pamela Daley stepped down as a non-executive director in July 2025, with Melody Meyer's retirement planned for the 2026 Annual General Meeting.

Icon Activist Investor Influence

Elliott Management acquired a 5% stake in February 2025, advocating for increased investment in fossil fuels. This move reportedly contributed to a 6.5% rise in BP's share price.

The influence of activist investors has emerged as a significant trend affecting BP's ownership dynamics. In February 2025, the U.S. hedge fund Elliott Management acquired a substantial 5% stake in the company. Elliott Management has been actively advocating for strategic changes aimed at unlocking shareholder value, with reports indicating a push for greater investment in the company's core oil and gas operations. This increased activist involvement coincided with a notable 6.5% surge in BP's share price, as the market anticipated a potential refocus on traditional energy production. This trend aligns with a broader industry observation of increasing institutional ownership and a re-evaluation of ambitious energy transition targets by some energy majors in favor of more immediate profitability. BP's financial strategy also reflects this direction, with a stated objective to reduce its net debt to between $14 billion and $18 billion by 2027, down from $23 billion in 2024. This financial management approach is likely to influence future capital allocation decisions and, consequently, the company's ownership structure. Understanding these shifts is crucial for comprehending the evolving Mission, Vision & Core Values of BP.

BP Porter's Five Forces Analysis

  • Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
  • Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
  • 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
  • Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
  • Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked
Get Related Template

Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.