Who Owns Hennes & Mauritz Company?

Hennes & Mauritz Bundle

Get Bundle
Get Full Bundle:
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10

TOTAL:

Who Owns Hennes & Mauritz?

Understanding H&M's ownership is key to its strategy and governance. The Persson family's increasing share accumulation fuels privatization speculation, highlighting shifts in corporate control. Founded in 1947 by Erling Persson, H&M has grown into a global fashion giant.

Who Owns Hennes & Mauritz Company?

The Persson family's continued, accelerated share accumulation has intensified speculation about a potential privatization, underscoring the dynamic nature of corporate control and its implications for market stakeholders.

The ownership structure of H&M is a fascinating mix of family legacy and public investment. The Persson family, descendants of founder Erling Persson, holds a significant stake and considerable voting power through a dual-class share system. This structure allows the family to maintain substantial influence over the company's strategic direction. As of 2024, H&M Group operates across 75 markets with around 140,000 employees, reporting net sales of SEK 234,478 million. For a deeper understanding of the external factors influencing the company, a Hennes & Mauritz PESTEL Analysis can provide valuable context.

Who Founded Hennes & Mauritz?

The foundation of H&M's ownership traces back to its founder, Erling Persson. He opened the first store in Västerås, Sweden, in 1947, initially selling only women's clothing under the name 'Hennes'. Persson's vision for a high-volume, low-price retail model was inspired by his travels in the United States.

Key Event Year Significance
Founding of 'Hennes' 1947 Erling Persson opens first store, focusing on women's apparel.
Acquisition of Mauritz Widforss 1968 Expansion into menswear and renaming to Hennes & Mauritz.
Initial Public Offering (IPO) 1974 Company listed on the Stockholm Stock Exchange.
Icon

Founder's Vision

Erling Persson established the company with a focus on high turnover and accessible pricing. This strategy was key to its early growth and market penetration.

Icon

Product Diversification

The acquisition of Mauritz Widforss in 1968 was a turning point. It allowed for the inclusion of menswear and children's clothing, broadening the brand's appeal.

Icon

Early Ownership Concentration

From its inception, H&M's ownership was largely concentrated within the Persson family. This familial control has been a consistent aspect of the company's history.

Icon

Market Expansion

Following its establishment, the company rapidly expanded its presence across Sweden. By 1964, it had already ventured into Norway, demonstrating early success in regional markets.

Icon

Public Offering

The company went public in 1974, listing its shares on the Stockholm Stock Exchange. This marked a significant step in its evolution as a publicly traded entity.

Icon

Brand Evolution

The initial name 'Hennes' was changed to Hennes & Mauritz to reflect the expanded product range. This name was later shortened to the widely recognized H&M.

The early ownership structure of H&M was predominantly held by the Persson family, a legacy that continues to influence the company's direction. Erling Persson's strategic decisions, including the acquisition of Mauritz Widforss in 1968, were instrumental in shaping the brand's identity and product offerings. This move not only diversified the inventory to include menswear but also led to the company's renaming to Hennes & Mauritz, later abbreviated to H&M. The company's journey as a publicly traded entity began with its IPO on the Stockholm Stock Exchange in 1974, a pivotal moment in its history and a key aspect of its Brief History of Hennes & Mauritz.

Icon

H&M's Founding Principles

Erling Persson's business philosophy centered on offering fashionable clothing at affordable prices, a concept he observed during his travels. This approach fueled the company's rapid expansion and established its market position.

  • Founded in 1947 by Erling Persson.
  • Initial focus on women's clothing under the name 'Hennes'.
  • Acquired Mauritz Widforss in 1968, expanding product lines.
  • Renamed to Hennes & Mauritz, later shortened to H&M.
  • Went public with an IPO in 1974 on the Stockholm Stock Exchange.

Hennes & Mauritz SWOT Analysis

  • Complete SWOT Breakdown
  • Fully Customizable
  • Editable in Excel & Word
  • Professional Formatting
  • Investor-Ready Format
Get Related Template

How Has Hennes & Mauritz’s Ownership Changed Over Time?

The initial public offering in 1974 marked a pivotal moment in the company's history, broadening its ownership base and introducing institutional investors to its shareholder structure. This transition to a publicly traded company, however, did not diminish the founding family's influence.

Shareholder Group Total Shares (%) Voting Rights (%)
Persson Family (incl. Ramsbury Invest AB) 64.91 83.22
Lottie Tham Family 5.53 2.64
AMF Fonder & Pension 2.55 1.22
Vanguard Funds 1.32 0.63
Fjärde AP-fonden 1.27 0.61
Blackrock 1.25 0.60

The dual-class share system, implemented to ensure the founding family's continued control, has been instrumental in maintaining the Persson family's significant influence over the company's strategic direction. This structure, where A-shares hold ten votes and B-shares one, allows for concentrated decision-making power, prioritizing long-term growth and stability. As of July 31, 2025, the Stefan Persson family and associated entities held a commanding 64.91% of total shares and an even more substantial 83.22% of voting rights, underscoring their enduring control over the H&M Group. This level of family ownership is a key factor in understanding who owns H&M and how its strategic decisions are made, often aligning with the vision of the H&M founder.

Icon

Key Stakeholders and Voting Power

The ownership structure reflects a blend of family control and institutional investment. The Persson family's substantial voting rights significantly influence corporate governance.

  • The Persson family, through Ramsbury Invest AB, holds the majority of voting rights.
  • Institutional investors like AMF Fonder & Pension and Vanguard Funds are significant minority shareholders.
  • The dual-class share system is central to maintaining family control.
  • Understanding these stakeholders is crucial for analyzing the company's strategic direction and its Target Market of Hennes & Mauritz.

Hennes & Mauritz PESTLE Analysis

  • Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
  • No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
  • Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
  • Instant Download, Ready to Use
  • 100% Editable, Fully Customizable
Get Related Template

Who Sits on Hennes & Mauritz’s Board?

As of early 2025, the Board of Directors for Hennes & Mauritz includes eight ordinary members elected by the general meeting, three employee representatives, and is chaired by Karl-Johan Persson, a member of the founding family. Other elected members include Stina Bergfors, Anders Dahlvig, Danica Kragic Jensfelt, Lena Patriksson Keller, Helena Saxon, Christian Sievert, and Christina Synnergren. The current CEO, Daniel Ervér, also holds a board position.

Board Member Affiliation
Karl-Johan Persson Chairperson, Founding Family
Daniel Ervér CEO
Stina Bergfors Elected Member
Anders Dahlvig Elected Member
Danica Kragic Jensfelt Elected Member
Lena Patriksson Keller Elected Member
Helena Saxon Elected Member
Christian Sievert Elected Member
Christina Synnergren Elected Member
Employee Representatives (3) Employee Appointed

The voting power within Hennes & Mauritz is significantly influenced by its dual-class share structure. Class A shares are granted ten votes each, while Class B shares have one vote per share. The Persson family, primarily through Ramsbury Invest AB, holds all Class A shares. This arrangement gives them substantial control over voting rights, even if their capital ownership is lower. By October 31, 2024, Ramsbury Invest AB controlled approximately 78.4% of the voting rights, and by mid-2025, the Persson family's overall voting control reached about 85%. This concentration of voting power ensures the family's decisive influence on critical corporate decisions, including board appointments and major strategic shifts. The nomination committee, appointed by the largest shareholders, further reinforces the family's indirect governance impact. Discussions regarding H&M's governance have previously touched upon transparency issues related to management changes and executive shareholdings, indicating ongoing scrutiny of its corporate structure and Revenue Streams & Business Model of Hennes & Mauritz.

Icon

Voting Power and Family Influence

The Persson family maintains significant control over Hennes & Mauritz through a dual-class share system. This structure allows them to wield considerable influence over the company's direction.

  • Class A shares hold 10 votes per share.
  • Class B shares hold 1 vote per share.
  • Ramsbury Invest AB, controlled by the Persson family, holds all Class A shares.
  • As of mid-2025, the Persson family controls approximately 85% of the voting rights.

Hennes & Mauritz Business Model Canvas

  • Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
  • Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
  • Investor-Ready BMC Format
  • 100% Editable and Customizable
  • Clear and Structured Layout
Get Related Template

What Recent Changes Have Shaped Hennes & Mauritz’s Ownership Landscape?

Over the last three to five years, the ownership landscape of Hennes & Mauritz has seen a significant shift, marked by the founding Persson family's increased share accumulation. This trend has fueled considerable market speculation regarding a potential privatization of the Swedish retail giant.

Shareholder Ownership Stake (Mid-2025) Voting Rights (Mid-2025)
Persson Family (via Ramsbury Invest) Approximately 64% Approximately 85%

The Persson family has strategically increased its stake in Hennes & Mauritz, investing over US$6.6 billion since 2016. This methodical accumulation has seen their ownership grow from 35.5% to nearly 64% of the company's capital by mid-2025. The family's buying pace accelerated in the first half of 2025, with 42.75 million shares acquired by July. Analysts suggest this self-funded strategy, utilizing reinvested dividends, could lead to the family reaching 80% ownership by 2030 and potentially initiating a delisting as early as 2027, should they reach 90% ownership. Despite official denials, this consistent buying activity has intensified discussions about the company returning to private ownership.

Icon Family Consolidation of Control

The Persson family's substantial share purchases signal a strong intent to consolidate control over Hennes & Mauritz. This move could be a strategic response to navigate the competitive global fashion market.

Icon Share Buyback Programs

Hennes & Mauritz has also engaged in its own share buyback initiatives. In 2024, the company repurchased 6,050,850 B shares worth SEK 1 billion. Further buybacks occurred in 2025 for the long-term incentive program.

Icon Leadership and Market Challenges

The company experienced a leadership change with Daniel Ervér succeeding Helena Helmersson as CEO in January 2024. Hennes & Mauritz faces intense competition from rivals and ultra-fast fashion players, contributing to a 9% year-to-date share price decline in 2025.

Icon Market Position and Future Outlook

As of mid-2025, Hennes & Mauritz holds a market capitalization of approximately SEK 187 billion (US$19.7 billion). The family's increasing control may offer strategic flexibility to implement long-term plans, potentially away from public market scrutiny, as detailed in the Growth Strategy of Hennes & Mauritz.

Hennes & Mauritz Porter's Five Forces Analysis

  • Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
  • Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
  • 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
  • Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
  • Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked
Get Related Template

Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.